|

Former Justices Stevens & O’Connor Reject ‘Citizens United’ Ruling

We have all read great articles written by talented authors. This showdown Former Justices Stevens & O’Connor Reject ‘Citizens United’ Ruling was a long time a coming. But Former Justices Stevens & O’Connor Reject ‘Citizens United’ Ruling doesn’t stop here. The writer shows two wonderful talents. Read the the rest sections to see what I mean. By: Latest News on HuffPost

Former Supreme Court Justices John Paul Stevens and Sandra Day O’Connor recently appeared to reach a similar conclusion about the majority decision reached by their former colleagues in Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Committee earlier this year: it was a “mistake.”

In an interview between the two in Newsweek, Stevens, who stood on the dissenting side of Citizens United, characterized the final decision in the case as a failure that he would like to see readdressed:

O’Connor: I suppose the court has had occasion to change its view on certain issues over a period of years. Do you see any on the horizon that you think the court might well reexamine as things go on?

Stevens: Well, you know, Sandra, I dissented in a lot of cases, and I’d like [the court] to reexamine them all [laughs]. I don’t expect them to, but I think they made a serious mistake in the [Citizens United] campaign-finance case, in which they overruled the portion of an opinion you and I jointly authored [on the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law]. And I think you might share my view.

O’Connor, who retired before the Citizens United ruling, then responded with a less direct criticism of the Supreme Court’s final determination:

I notice that myself, and when I am asked about it, I often say, “Well, the court overruled part of what I wrote.” And leave it there. It is a source of concern today, the extent of campaign contributions and whether corporations and unions must be held to the [same] standard as an individual. These are tough issues for the nation and the court.

A recent analysis of the effects of Citizens United found that $132.5 million, about 15 percent of all federal political spending in the recent election cycle, was channeled by anonymous groups or unlimited donations authorized by the Supreme Court’s ruling.


Get HuffPost Politics On
Twitter and Facebook!


Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!

This news, Former Justices Stevens & O’Connor Reject ‘Citizens United’ Ruling citation from Latest News on HuffPost

Short URL: http://www.usnews9.com/?p=4792

Posted by on Dec 21 2010. Filed under Blog. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Recently Commented

  • James Mitchell: Oakland raid is latest in Occupy camp crackdowns
  • tatwizard: BLVCK FRIDAY 11252011 ALL BLACK EVERYTHING DJWIZZKIDD amp; DJVISION_ BURNIN RUBBER ON NIGGAS
  • Peter Occupy Austin: RT steveweinstein: Thousands of Riot Cops Descend on Occupy Oakland, 32 Arrested, But No...
  • Justin Bieber: Griffin iTrip FM Transmitter for iPod and iPhone: Black Friday Griffin iTrip FM Transmitter for iPod...
  • Austin Kinney: RT cavewallshadows: